HOW TO KILL A MAN

The easiest task is to kill a man, and the toughest task is to kill a man. Stabbing to death is just the physical part of kill. The real pleasure is to kill someone slowly and enjoy the one watching die every moment, without letting the one realise that one is moving towards death. A murderer smells the actual victory, when he watches his victim, who bears the brutality of murderer’s cruelness which paralyses the victim, makes him dependent, and zeros him. There lies the real pleasure of committing a murder.

This pacifying murder can by no means be committed physically. The murderer has to attack within the victim. He has to attack the soul of the victim. The victim’s existence has to be subdued; his existence should be made a favour. A man may bear the loss of any materialistic thing; the real carnage is when has to lose his soul, when he has to lose his integrity and when he has to lose his ego. These unbearable losses, crush a man, they crush him into tiny pieces of regret.

Once a man loses his integrity and soul, there’s nothing for the man to defend apart from the material things. In a polished language, the murderer may call himself the leader and his victims his followers. The murderer makes his victims realize that everyone needs a soul, and it is he, who would provide a worthy soul to his followers.  

The best weapons that can be used against a victim are the carnage words: altruism, a life for others, brotherhood etc. These words are nothing but, soul denting bullets, coated with sweetness of the worldly pollute. The killer needs to make the victim realise that self happiness is the height of ego, make him condemn himself for being happy. If the victim’s rich he should bear the brunt of not helping others; if the victim’s satisfied, he should be tortured with thoughts of filthy people; if the victim’s smiling his smile should be belittled with the sorrows of the world.

The victim should be realized that he has no reason to remain happy, whenever he would see sadness around him, he should be apprised that he’s a parasite and should be bitten with thoughts about any wastage which was done by him was tantamount to a spiritual sin. As soon as he would enjoy his life, he should be bombarded with avalanche of fugitive thoughts, such as, there is a higher level of happiness which he is not experiencing, denigrate all his happiness.  He would find his soul suffocating in this perceptual doggy world.

Alas, we all are being brutally killed by some people, selling fairness creams to those, who think they lack visual appeal. We have been murdered by movie stars who pinch us by telling that we don’t have a good physique and attractive looks. We have been assassinated by those telling we are fat, by those telling us we lack confidence, by those deciding our needs, and by those apprising the society of, the so called, “Status”

Freedom – The intellectual fallacy the of contemporary world

Rules are the best mould for freedom, now whether they are rules or constraints, without them, freedom is devoid of its purpose. Thinking from philosophical point of view, these rules and constraints, apparently, destitute us of some liberty, but deep in our subconscious mind, cushion us with the comfort of the freedom of security.

The basic tendency of any object is to fall down to earth, but by constraining it with hinges, knots etc, an object will not only, very well, serve its purpose, but will be used to perform, far better tasks. A normal rod can be used as a lever, that too, just by constraining its motion.

We all have been fighting for freedom of choice, but now this freedom of choice has made humans more handicapped than they were earlier, without any. The television industry epitomizes it. Now with 200 + channels available, we hardly watch any channel faithfully and this has led us to a bigger insecurity of missing the soap and leads to a great deal of dissatisfaction.

A well regulated society would always keep its citizen happy, satisfied and without any tension. One would never have to bother about some person pestering one. A traffic light constraints our free movement, by urging us to stop, but gives us the freedom of security of not being overrun by a vehicle. We don’t realize, but these rules give us a lot of freedom, provided, we stick to the rules.

This is equivalent to giving a definitive direction to a large magnitude of force, produced by various sources. Otherwise, without any constraint, the effect would be nothing more than the Brownian motion. The results produced by the unity in direction are beyond imagination and those can never be achieved without any proper channelization.

The Circle In Life

I know, by now most of the people reading this would be wondering of some silly grammatical error. I believe, you might be gripped by the thought that, when, everyone talks of the circle of life, then, what is the circle in life? The next few paragraphs will be dedicated to defending the preposition. And let me clarify this point to all of you, this circle is the most coveted one, though it’s either latent or obscured because of our dogma.

We all have our religious beliefs and we try our best to comply with them. But the most intriguing question asked to a devotee is, “Have you ever seen God” and then starts the flow of some philosophical dialogs, which by their nature are subjective, finding no end in the ocean of spirituality. But just give a thought over the question once again. Is there any means by which we can prove the existence of God?

Every artist, writer, sportsman or for that sake any person, has a definite style of completing tasks and in his or her task, the person leaves back his / her signature. This thought made me feel that, even The Creator too must have some signature.

Let’s take a few examples, during our puerility period, every one used to play water games like splashing water, throwing stones in water and watching the ripples, enjoying water bubbles by adding some detergent or soap etc. This is the beginning of the visibility of The Signature. Contemplating on the various scenarios, we can derive that the shapes formed by the above activities either have a circular shape or a circular cross-section or are derived from circle.

Splashing water forms water droplets which are Spherical. Water waves are Circular, while the water bubbles are again spherical.

This is just the beginning of the journey. Let’s consider science. The electron, protons neutrons etc are shown as spherical in shape. In the atomic structure, the atoms revolving around the neutron take a circular orbit. Parallel to this, our solar system has the same signature. The sun is spherical in shape and the spherical planets revolve around it in elliptical motion, a shape derived from circle.

In case of mechanics, the simplest machines like the levers while in motion make an arc, a shape derived from circle. The pulley itself is a circle and the wheel too is in a circular form.

Coming back to nature, the umbilical cord, the first connection between a mother and a child has a circular cross-section. Most parts of our body have a circular cross-section or a shape derived from it. Most of the fruits, naturally grown, the bark of a tree, the branches, the roots, all have the same cross-section.

The sound travels a circular path; the most efficient mechanical equipments have the components which have a circular shape. The streamline motion forms an arc.
Having talked of the constructive things, let’s share some light on the fury. The volcano craters, the tornado, the whirlpool all have something in common. We see the same signature. Circle.

Any natural thing around us that we witness has something to do with circular shape. Some of us might well term it a co-incidence. But is this fact too minute to be degraded as a co-incidence? Here, I would like to  borrow a line from Master Uguay, “There are no accidents”. And I conceive this is as a hidden message, in form of symbols gifted to humans, and, we, being ignorant, are, dogmatically, trying to carve God out of stone.

GURU

One of the most distinctive features of a language is its ability to express the most complex things in the most lucid forms. Whenever we see a particular object, or have an ephemeral thought in our mind, it’s a language that gives us the ability and, mind it, the liberty to express it. A language abstaining from such characteristic is like a beautiful beggar. Though she’s beautiful, but she can’t express her beauty for the lack of means. Thus a rich language will always be able to magnet the educated class.

Recently we celebrated Guru Purnima, which is supposed to be an occasion of paying respect to our gurus. Suddenly something flabbergasted me, what is the English translation of the word Guru. English dictionary describes Guru as, any person who counsels or advises or a mentor. I am pretty sure, that’s what it does not mean, since mentor is a trusted guide or an advisor. A guru is not only for advice, but majorly for inner peace.

A guru cannot be a teacher since a teacher does it by profession, while a Guru follows the path by choice. Guru cannot be described as a guide since a guide only shows us the way. The art of a Guru is not only to show us the way, but to make us capable of walking alone. It would be foolish to perceive Guru as an advisor. An advisor does it for money.

Guru can neither be defined as a Father since the father son relationship grows to be a symbiotic one. Guru is not even a mother since he would, unlike her; constantly make the child aware of wrong doings.

But then how can we define Guru. Which word would suffice the vast sphere of a Guru’s nature? Which word has the honour of describing a Guru?  For me, there’s just one word. Guru means LIGHT.